Onslaught - Movie Review

There is a very simple version of Onslaught that works.

Three hulking super soldiers break loose. They descend on a trailer park in the middle of nowhere. A military veteran and single mother has to get her daughter out alive before the night turns into target practice with chainsaws.

That is a movie. Honestly, that is more of a movie than half the overproduced sludge getting dumped into theaters now. Give me a clean survival premise, a confined location, practical carnage, and villains who look like Jason Voorhees got government funding. I can work with that.

The problem is Onslaught does not seem totally comfortable being that movie. It wants to be a nasty Fangoria-style bloodbath, then it wants to put on the black turtleneck and pretend there is something profound happening under the gore. Every time it starts to have fun, it remembers it has themes. Every time it reaches for themes, it remembers the audience came to watch genetically engineered murder tanks turn people into mulch.

So yes, I had fun with it.

Also yes, this thing is absolutely up its own ass.

The setup is ridiculous, which is fine

Adam Wingard directs Onslaught like he is trying to make a midnight movie that got contaminated by festival-film brain. The early stretch has that self-conscious style where you can almost hear the movie whispering, "Look how cool this shot is." Slow motion, grime, attitude, weird little mood swings. The whole thing feels tailor-made for critics who want to say "grindhouse" without admitting they just watched a B-movie with a better camera package.

Then the plot finally kicks in, and the movie gets a lot easier to enjoy.

There is an old German scientist, or at least a younger actor buried under old-man makeup that does not entirely win the argument. Maybe that is intentional. Maybe the movie wanted the rubbery B-movie flavor. Maybe someone saw the dailies and said, "Fine, now it is a throwback." I have no idea. Either way, the guy has created a batch of super soldiers, and those super soldiers are the movie's best idea.

They are huge. They are menacing. Their eyes glow in the dark because, naturally, they can see in the dark. They do not negotiate. They do not quip. They just keep moving until everybody around them is dead.

That is the kind of dumb I respect.

The monsters carry a lot of dead weight

The super soldiers are where Onslaught finds its pulse. One of them spends a chunk of the movie with a chainsaw, which gives the whole thing a wonderful "Leatherface enlisted" energy. Add military hardware and you basically get Michael Myers, Jason Voorhees, and a commando unit blended into one ugly problem.

That is the lane where the movie works best: mean, loud, nasty, and direct.

The kills have impact. The violence is not always clever, but it has weight. There is a scene where a place gets shot up and the camera drifts across the aftermath. One small detail lands harder than the movie probably deserves: a victim's phone showing a call from "Mom." It is simple, almost cheap, but it works. For one second, the cannon fodder stops being cannon fodder. Then, naturally, the movie moves on, because we have more people to slaughter and not enough reasons to remember most of their names.

That is the central issue. Onslaught has bodies. It has blood. It has attitude. It does not have many characters worth caring about.

Adria Arjona does what she can as the mother at the center of the story, and she is easily the strongest human element here. The movie gives her the basic action-survivor package: military background, maternal drive, enough competence to make the night feel like a fight instead of an execution. She sells it. You can see the action-star version of this performance trying to break out through the script.

But most of the surrounding cast exists to raise the body count. That is not automatically a problem in this kind of movie. Slashers have been feeding anonymous victims into the machine forever. The difference is that the best versions make the disposable characters entertaining before they become disposable. Here, a lot of them feel like placeholders waiting for their scheduled appointment with the gore department.

The movie keeps reaching for depth it never earns

Onslaught has side plots that feel like they escaped from a longer, messier draft. The lead's military past is introduced like it is going to matter in a bigger emotional or thematic way, then mostly becomes a credential. There is a cleanup-man type who wanders in from some neon-lit underworld and looks like he took a wrong turn out of The Crow: City of Angels. His intro is memorable in that "what movie did I just walk into?" way, but the character never justifies the space he occupies.

Take him out and you probably get a shorter movie. Maybe that is the answer. Maybe he is there because somebody looked at the runtime and panicked.

The film also flirts with military-industrial commentary without having much to say about it beyond "secret programs bad" and "super soldiers kill people." Fair enough, I agree super soldiers murdering trailer park residents is generally undesirable. But if the movie wants to be cerebral, it has to do more than gesture at a theme and then sprint back to the chainsaw.

This is where the A24-ish stink starts to creep in. Not because elevated horror is bad. It is bad when a movie wants credit for depth it has not built. Onslaught keeps trying to split the difference between trashy pleasure and serious-minded genre commentary, and the balance is wobbly.

Commit to the schlock or write the better script. Pick a sin.

The pacing mostly saves it

For all the complaints, Onslaught is not boring once it locks in. The movie uses a countdown during the first act, and that is a neat little hook. You do not know exactly what it is counting toward, but you know something ugly is coming. It gives the opening stretch some forward pull, even when the style is doing too much.

Once the super soldiers are loose, the movie becomes much easier to forgive. It has a simple engine: survive the night. That is not complicated, and it should not be. The best action-horror hybrids understand that momentum is character development's dirtbag cousin. Sometimes you just need the audience asking, "How are they getting out of this?"

Onslaught gets enough of that right to stay watchable.

The third act has the gore and chaos people are buying tickets for. It is not as strong as it could be, and I understand the complaints from people who felt the payoff did not match the buildup. There are moments where the movie feels like it is saving mythology for a sequel instead of making this story hit harder. That always annoys me. I did not pay to watch a pitch deck with blood squibs.

Still, when Onslaught remembers what it is, it cooks.

Final take

Onslaught is a messy, over-stylized, occasionally very fun action-horror movie. It has a strong lead performance from Adria Arjona, some nasty kills, and villains that understand the value of walking slowly toward people with terrible intentions.

It also has thin characters, half-developed themes, and a weird need to seem smarter than its own premise. This should have been leaner, meaner, and less impressed with itself.

If you want a polished genre classic, this is not it. If you want a dirty little bloodbath where super soldiers turn a trailer park into a war zone, you will probably get enough out of it. No alcohol required, though I would not blame anyone for bringing popcorn with low expectations.

Verdict: fun junk with delusions of depth.

Subscribe to Game Pilled: https://www.youtube.com/@GamePilledBlog
Join the Based New Wave!