DIGGER Is Either Brilliant or Completely Insufferable

Tom Cruise has made a movie that may be impossible to review without spoiling the experience. So here’s the spoiler-free version: DIGGER is a loud, strange, wildly ambitious black comedy about oil, power, climate disaster, and the kind of wealthy man who believes every problem can be solved by talking louder than everyone else.

Sometimes, it works.

Sometimes, it feels like the director is standing in front of the screen explaining the joke while the joke is still happening.

The Tom Cruise Show

Cruise plays Digger Rockwell, an absurdly wealthy oil tycoon whose negligence helps cause a catastrophic disaster. A massive iceberg breaks loose, putting Europe and the rest of the world in danger.

That is the basic setup. From there, the movie becomes a parade of political absurdity, public panic, religious extremism, media manipulation, and people yelling at each other about the end of civilization.

And Tom Cruise is in the middle of nearly all of it.

This is absolutely the Tom Cruise show. John Goodman, Riz Ahmed, Jesse Plemons, and the rest of the cast are all perfectly capable performers, but the movie belongs to Cruise. He plays Rockwell as a man who is simultaneously brilliant, arrogant, ridiculous, and deeply convinced that his own charisma counts as a plan.

It is an enormous performance. Cruise is clearly swinging for awards, and the movie makes sure you know it. Every pause has weight. Every outburst is calibrated for the trailer. Every strange little gesture seems designed to make someone say, “That’s the scene where he wins the Oscar.”

The funny thing is that Cruise sells the performance anyway.

There is a real contrast between Rockwell’s absurd public persona and the moments when the performance drops away. When Cruise stops performing eccentricity and simply plays the man underneath it, the movie gets more interesting. He can make the character look ridiculous without making him completely empty.

That dynamic is probably the strongest thing in the film.

The Big Swing

There is a major thing that happens early in DIGGER. That is as specific as I’m going to be.

It changes how you process the entire movie. It is also the kind of creative choice that will divide the audience immediately. Some people will call it the most pretentious thing they have ever seen. Others will call it a brilliant formal experiment. A third group will say it is a mess with one genuinely cool idea buried inside.

Then there will be the people who think it is the greatest movie of the year.

I understand all four reactions.

The movie takes a huge swing, and I respect it for that. The problem is that the rest of DIGGER does not always have the discipline to support the swing. The film wants to be a black comedy, a disaster movie, a political satire, an awards showcase, and a meditation on how people turn facts into stories.

Those ideas can coexist. Here, they keep stepping on one another.

The film is at its best when it trusts the audience to recognize what it is doing. There is one sequence involving facts and storytelling that illustrates the movie’s central idea in real time. Rockwell shows how people can know the truth and still accept a more satisfying version of events.

That scene works because it lets the concept play out instead of simply announcing the thesis.

Unfortunately, DIGGER does not always show that restraint.

Too Much Yelling, Not Enough Humor

This is a black comedy, and the movie clearly wants to be funny. I just wish it were funnier.

There are good jokes here, along with some genuinely bizarre moments that earned a laugh from me. But too much of the humor gets buried beneath shouting, monologues, and characters explaining exactly how the audience is supposed to feel.

The movie has a lot of yelling. A lot.

There are scenes where a character delivers a long speech about the grievance at the center of the story, usually at maximum volume, while the camera waits for the emotional payoff. Eventually, I started thinking that the movie could have made the same point in a social-media post and saved itself five minutes.

That is a shame, because the quieter ideas are often much better than the speeches built around them.

The sound design is another story. The effects are punchy, the disaster sequences have real weight, and the production clearly understands how to make the world feel unstable. But the dialogue is mixed with the same force. Every argument sounds like it is taking place inside a collapsing building.

A little less volume would have helped the humor land. It also would have given the serious material more room to breathe.

The Politics Are Less Important Than the Execution

It would be easy to watch the trailer and assume DIGGER is going to function as a simple political sermon. The premise involves climate change, a negligent oil tycoon, a president in a blue suit and red tie, religious zealots, and repeated references to China.

That sounds like a movie designed to divide the audience before the opening credits.

But I don’t think people will love or hate DIGGER based on their politics. The response will come down to whether the movie’s execution works for them.

You can see the intended commentary. You can also see where the writing is trying too hard to make sure nobody misses it. The film’s political material is broad, but it is not as neatly partisan as the premise suggests. Its targets are spread around. The real subject is how institutions, elites, media, and ordinary people turn a crisis into competing stories that make them feel safer.

That is a decent idea. Sometimes the movie handles it with intelligence. Other times, it puts the idea in a character’s mouth and has them scream it at us.

Final Take

There is a side story in DIGGER that feels mostly useless. It adds context, but the movie could have lost it without losing much else. The pacing also suffers from the film’s need to keep proving how unusual it is.

Still, I had a pretty good time with it.

That is not a full endorsement. DIGGER is messy, self-important, occasionally hilarious, and frequently exhausting. It is also energetic, visually confident, and willing to take a swing that most studio movies would avoid entirely.

The complaints are legitimate. The humor often fails to land. The storytelling can feel bloated. The monologues are exhausting. The whole thing sometimes resembles a two-hour argument with an awards campaign attached.

But that big creative choice worked for me. When the movie landed, it landed hard enough that I was willing to forgive some of the nonsense around it.

If the swing does not work for you, leave the theater and save your money. You are not going to be persuaded by the rest of the movie.

If it does work, though, DIGGER becomes a strange, memorable moviegoing experience. Not necessarily a great one. Definitely not a clean one. But there is something here.

I dug it.

Verdict: A messy but fascinating swing that is worth taking at matinee price.

Subscribe to Game Pilled: https://www.youtube.com/@GamePilledBlog
Join the Based New Wave!